Fourth task B

Nancy S
West Kelowna   April 8, 2018

'' This article is premised on a false dichotomy - that chimps are either human or things. Now it may be that because of quirks in the law this is what lawyers are facing, but it is still false.
There clearly are humans, animals and inanimate objects i.e. "things". The borders between can get fuzzy (e.g. are bacteria and viruses animals or things?)''

It is clearly a disagreement because she is not convinced with the arguments proposed in the article and she gives reasons


Jim Sheridan
Rhode Island   April 8, 2018

'' Corporations are treated as persons under the First Amendment which resulted in the democracy killing Citizens United case.   If an inanimate legal construct can be a person,  one must consider the case for a living, breathing, intelligent, social, quasi-human cousin like the chimpanzee.''

It is an explanation because he is giving reasons why a corporation can be considered a person.

Marvant Duhon
Bloomington Indiana   April 7, 2018

''I agree with Sebo that "Kiko and Tommy are not mere things". I have never had a pet dog or cat that was a "mere" thing. The birds at our feeders, whether starlings or hawks are not "mere" things''

It is clearly an agreement because Marvant follows the viewpoint of the author of the article.

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Reflections of '' What is critical thinking?''

Assumptions

Reflections about stereotypes